I see the persons whom I suspect as scum hard-defending me, and some townreaded players whom I trusted are now seriously being flaky.
Let's step aside from the rolegaming for a second.
Who do we actually most heavily scumread, which, as the defendent, I have little ability to decipher.
I continue to heavily scumread Raikaria, based on how quickly he retreated from this firefight once the war is started.
I can do a Serela vote, off the impossibility of the counterclaimed role, its not a town move because he would otherwise be a Tracker now, which he should have otherwise defended all his life because he can hard confirm comes N2 on someone's results.
However, I think one significant possibility is the setup can be designed specifically to confuse role-gaming by introducing complex flavours and simple flavours.
In addition, scum can and may be driving the game as a duo from Fabloo/PX. I think Fabloo has a very strong voice that is driving the wagon, and Disquieted has given up on thinking, we really should take a breather and read the firefight from a non-role angle.
The claims have already been out sufficiently, as far as I can agree on, but I think the directions of the firefight are important.
I still have not been convinced entirely we can break this game based on role-gaming alone, on D2, with only 1 flip.
This is an over-optimistic angle which is scum driven to rolefish because only scum has the hard confirmations which they must know my crumb is valid. I believe some of the claims, which may include that from Serela, Fabloo, Yaesulf, and the yet-unknown nongender player must be scum
cut by 19
