Abu could have asked Kilga.
If he did, and Nuxl claimed it was him, that'd be quite bold to assume no living player did so.
Smartbomb, I read your post about Conq and other general reads. Considering Conq might very well be a wagon at some point I'd like to go over a couple of things in there so I can make a more informed read on him.
On Abu's vig claim and general EOD1:
The post you quoted seems ok to me. The line "Vigging dusk does not make me less inclined to lynch you" is the only thing I'd find fault with since I don't know why anyone would care if dusk was vigged there unless Conq thought Dusk was town.
Can you point me to the post referenced below if it's not
#636the heel turn Conqueror makes to eventually lynch Abu is... like very opportunistic and I can't see how this comes from a town alignment. It's a very classic pressure slip.
if that does refer to #636 then I think that's more a natural reaction since at that point it does look like Abu gave up.
With regard to the tracker claim D2: Does not
#1094 answer the questions that prefaces your quote of Conq's 1093? Now I dunno if I'd believe those reasons, but its a rather concise explanation. I don't agree with the premise that a person not falling over = a town read, especially for a player of shadoweh's caliber, so it makes sense to me that if Conq got nothing out of it then there's no reason to alter his read.
For the general play part, you said that Conq hasn't been thinking about other people aside from Shadoweh D2 and also that
It... just doesn't feel like he's tunnelling at all. Like he said, he moved off from Shadoweh to Duskfall. I don't know why Duskfall, really, I'm staring at these posts and I have no idea why Duskfall over any other player in the game. So like that's really bad for him cause it means he's evaluating other options, right? But he's not saying anything about them.
Can you clarify what you mean here? I think that if Conq was evaluating people not named shadoweh, and yet, limiting his opinions on them, then I think that is scummy. It's something I do as scum often. Can you expand on where you think this occurs if its esay to show, or is it something I should get if I reread D2, say. I don't really want to read, but I'd be interested in checking this.
Otherwise the responses to Raikaria were fine imo, and as I mentioned earlier there seemed to me to be a couple instances where Conq was thinking about Raikaria's alignment moreso than simply trying to prove Raikaria's case wrong.
We seem to have different reads on oarfish/sb, though I haven't really updated my sb read in a while and he deserves a fresh look through.
We really have completely different views on Niektory's posts. Can you point out the text that is "unclean"? most of Niek's posts touch Abu so I'm not sure what you're referring to. But If it's one where Niek votes Serela, then I have a hard time seeing how that is "good".