Hey @Serela why do you think raikaria is worth putting pressure votes on rn. Why do you think they're more worth pursuing for low content than niektory which you've admitted could be newb scum by your standards? And why did it take you getting prodded by nuxl to actually be bothered to vote raikaria? What?
What? When did I make any comment on niektory? The only emotion I have towards niektory is pity for their poor soul that this is their first mafia game apparently. A 17 member nightmare mashup of eimm players and motk washups who haven't had to play REAL BOY MAFIA for 5 years
First of all, I was still in the middle of rereading during those multiple posts. I was planning to make one big post, but, upon realizing that the new posts were going "WHY HASN'T SERELA POSTED YET, SERELA LOOKIN' PRETTY SCUMMY" I decided to just post what I had and continue rereading and do more posts after. (which I stated pretty clearly during said posts yay)
In other words, I had not changed my vote yet because
I wasn't done rereading the game. And, honestly, I'm not that invested in the Raikaria vote unless their new content isn't very inspiring, but it just came down to the fact that... I kept rereading and I wasn't seeing anything else interesting. So, I went ahead and dropped my vote on the one person who did manage to arise some level of suspicion. My previous vote had been an rvs jokevote (random vote stage) so even a lukewarm pressure vote was superior.
OK MOVING ON
NNR "scumslipping" and the ensuing wagon was hilarious and also about as airtight as my new computer case (which has porous mesh for the entire topside? what the what? man what have I been doing for the last 12 years) and what amazes me is that somehow this turned into an actual, serious vote by Zwerdjib aka zeep. Now, obviously, the vote isn't really about that anymore (at least I sure hope not), but over... a weird wagon hop? I mean, NNR provided three clear reasons, even if he didn't go to the point of grabbing lots of quotes and references yet.
And you're now saying the meta part was muddled and shifted your reasoning for voting him from how dodgy/cryptic he was. (which you explained after your vote, mind)
...ah, and this is just plain wrong. I mean, unless you interpret 'which you explained after you vote' as 'in the sentence after the vote, in the same post the vote is in'.
I'm trying to evaluate between overzealous town going after a slip a bit too hard or mafia digging their claws in, but honestly it's 2am right now and my brain is dying after doing a lot more computer set up stuff. I need to go to bed and re-eval in the morning zzzzzz
xinny looks nice so far hello good day <3 (oh wait good night) (wait no that comes across wrong)
i tried to look into dormio's vote on o4rfish because I thought the case actually sounded kind of interesting in hindsight but then I couldn't find the vote... and then I started wondering if I'm starting to imagine things and you know what YEP IT'S TIME TO GO TO BED I WILL BE BACK TOMORROW TO ADMINISTER YOUR DAILY DOSE OF SERELA