So, six players are dead and we haven't found any scum yet. This indicates scum are good players, right?
No; it indicates town are bad. I don't like this sort of attitude really. It's like it's guideing town to suspect 'good' players. This feels like sowing distrust.
O4rfish's D2 and D3 so far seem to contain a lot of speculation about how close Scum are to winning, how many scum there are, ect. Not sure if this is WiFoM; feigning ignorance to scum's wincon to seem more townie?
My lynch priorities are:
sb
Dormio
Shadoweh
I'm not good enough to write a convincing case right now against sb though. So I'll go with this
##Unvote
##Vote: Dormio
It's worth noting O4rfish dosen't case *any* of these. Or explain why one is ranked above another. I'm not good enough to write convinceing cases on people either, doesn't stop me
trying.I wasn't saying "you should stop voting me"
I was saying "you should reconsider how solid your case is"
I called this post out before.
There's quite a bit of Dormio v O4rfish ED2. But there is notably this snippett:
Your case on me d2: restate your previous case, and then
I disagree with the first part, obviously. For the second part, my read of Conq at that time was that he was less likely to be scum than anyone else, unless Shadoweh was letting him bus her.
O4rfish + Conq might be a thing, or at least this raises the chances. Notably O4rfish dosen't much otherwise talk about Townreads. [Not inherently a bad thing]
My wagon:
sb - probably scum
Dormio - more likely scum than not scum
NNR - more likely town than not town
Dormio is first deciding who to go after, then casing them. This in itself isn't scummy, but it looks bad if that's the only way you pick up suspects. I don't expect him to have a higher level of activity, but I do expect him to read the game rather than just isos.
Due to his statements, if Dormio is town then NNR is almost certainly town, and if Dormio is scum then NNR might still be town.
Again, O4rfish calls out SB as a top scumread, but doesn't case sb or anything, and instead focuses on Dormio later. This is
weird. I'd really like to hear more about sb from O4rfish. If you think he's your top scumread, can you actually case him? Vote him? Do anything except
passively call him your top scumread?
Conq is a pretty good player. I think his attack on Serela makes sense, but it's within his ability to fake. Reading his posts also makes me suspect Shadoweh, for not responding properly to his gambit.
If Shadoweh is town, then her townread on Conq is probably valid. But if Conq is town and continues to have a scumread on Shadoweh, then that's probably valid.
Praiseing and semi-sheeping Conq here, with just enough doubt to perhaps make a dissassociaton. Also; the 2nd part is something I'd like O4rfish to talk about. Shadoweh was town. What does this do in relation to your opinion on Conq? The only thing you've said related to him D3 is asking someone else if their opinions on him have changed.
Worth noting there's no smoke without fire in the accusations of O4rfish being quite defensive as well.
---
Can totally see O4rfish + Conq as a possibility. But I've also suggested Serela+Conq. Next up; reading Conq and looking at his interactions. Currently unsure if O4rfish or Serela are worse.
