Neo Forum Mafia - Game Over

[Nuxl]

OH SORRY NUXL I DIDN'T REPLY

TBH, I don't remember Flee...Fleet, whatever the other part of his name is. I feel like he was newb town but I don't like...remember anything about him?

his entrance content wise was kind of a more lighthearted niek's where he was 1. bothered with high volume and 2. didnt have any thoughts on entrance. if you don't remember that's fine, was hoping you would

but also, i just got baited by this in my most recent game and that player was scum so LOL

[Nuxl]

Is there some way to ISO people and if so, how do?

probably click on their profile and then click show posts

(i just got mystery dungeon so see you all one hour to deadline rofl)

[NekoNekoRex]

Jesus how am I only on page 4 of this

Conq wasn't kidding about 10 pages

[NekoNekoRex]

im using 40ppp so right now I'm halfway through. Current thoughts are mostly that I don't like zwerd, for a lot of reasons, the sheer amount of fluffposts he puts out is irritating. He also focuses on meta, and my stance on meta is that Meta Is Bad.

I don't like Nuxl for largely the same reason, defending him For Meta Reasons is very bad and scummy to me, especially since he threatens to retaliate people who vote him.

Hard to get any other reads due to the buttload of posts but I like Abu so far.

It looks like past this there's Actual Content so the reads may change

I wish people would not call people by off-site names, every time I hear "Zeep" I am confused thanks

[Kilgamayan]

Vote Count 1.4

O4rfish (Rumia) (0):
Prims (Narumi Yatadera) (2): Raikaria, Shadoweh
Dormio (Ran Yakumo) (0): sb, Niektory
Shadoweh (Yuuka Kazami) (4): Conqueror, Dormio Ergo Sum, ActionDan, zwerdjib, Conqueror, sb, Refa
Conqueror (Tenshi Hinanawi) (0): Shadoweh
Serela (Koishi Komeiji) (1): Serela, Prims
sb (Sanae Kochiya) (1): Xinnidy
AbuHumaid (YuugenMagan) (0): Serela
Raikaria (Sunny Milk) (2): Serela, zwerdjib
Xinnidy (Yumemi Okazaki) (0):
zwerdjib (Yuyuko Saigyouji) (1): AbuHumaid, Dormio Ergo Sum, O4rfish, Refa
Refa (Reimu Hakurei) (0): zwerdjib
ActionDan (Rinnosuke Morichika) (0):
NekoNekoRex (Chen) (1): zwerdjib, Niektory
Duskfall98 (Shinki) (1): Nuxl
Nuxl (Youki Konpaku) (2): Prims, O4rfish, AbuHumaid
Niektory (Yukari Yakumo) (0):

Not voting (2): NekoNekoRex, Duskfall98

With 17 alive, it takes 9 votes to lynch someone. You have a tremendous number of nanoseconds remaining to cast your votes.

Duskfall98 was previously prodded for inactivity.

[O4rfish]

NNR that is either the funniest scumslip or the lamest NOCslip.

##Unvote

##Vote: NNR

[zwerdjib]

fire trucking what did i say

[zwerdjib]

##unvote raikaria
vote nnr

[Kilgamayan]

Xinnidy and ActionDan have been prodded for inactivity.

[Sir Arthur Ignatius Conan Touhou]

O_O

your explanation nnr?

need to read serela reply at some point

[Conqueror]

:thonk:
Yes, an explanation would be nice. I don't think I mentioned 10 pages anywhere in my iso.

[Sir Arthur Ignatius Conan Touhou]

Damage control mode engaged

[NekoNekoRex]

you better read all 10 pages before writing a post

i got the name wrong because i hadn't gotten up to rereading 274 posts yet actually.

im not sure how much reading i can take in such a short time, I'm getting mental fatigue just trying to read all this strawberries.

voting is something i should be doing though and there is conveniently a votecount after my post so

##Vote: Nuxl I don't like them. Meta reads are bad. Not being open about reads is scummy. Dodging questions is scummy. I've seen a lot of all of that from them so far.

[Sir Arthur Ignatius Conan Touhou]

lol thats literally what i expected but f u for posting before conq could reply to my post trolling him

[Conqueror]

lol thats literally what i expected but f u for posting before conq could reply to my post trolling him

ahhh screw you. my reply was just going to be prims pls but i didnt want to give you the satisfaction >:(

[Conqueror]

NNR, which meta reads of nuxl are you talking about? From what I saw earlier he didn't make any meta reads since he doesnt know any of the meta here.

[zwerdjib]

i got the name wrong because i hadn't gotten up to rereading 274 posts yet actually.

im not sure how much reading i can take in such a short time, I'm getting mental fatigue just trying to read all this strawberries.

voting is something i should be doing though and there is conveniently a votecount after my post so

##Vote: Nuxl I don't like them. Meta reads are bad. Not being open about reads is scummy. Dodging questions is scummy. I've seen a lot of all of that from them so far.

visible confusion

please restate why you are voting. provide a quote. i am very lost right now.

also, i dont like this wagon hop. hard scumlean

[NekoNekoRex]

his entire actions the entire game felt incredibly stinted in a way where it's like reading a particular someone(caffeineboost) on smogon.  caffeineboost is a player who acts incredibly scummy as town and sorta towny as scum. pure awkwardness. gut pinged it as "really hard to be coached" here. anybody who votes zeep will feel the steel blade of my katana

do you have any strong meta tells on anyone here in particular? does anybody have any strong meta tells on anybody?

this is relevant to my first "job"

a lot of his posts refer to meta (the ones Ive read up to) but these kinda stood out to me.

my stomach is sinking because revisiting page 4 looks like something I don't remember reading and its making me confused. why the hell are there so many posts

this vote isn't really confident because i haven't fully read up but voting is better than not voting.

[NekoNekoRex]

being all cryptic and pushing people to make opinions for you is gay and lame

[NekoNekoRex]

visible confusion

please restate why you are voting. provide a quote. i am very lost right now.

also, i dont like this wagon hop. hard scumlean

says the guy who hopped to vote me based off a misquote

[NekoNekoRex]

yeah actually

##Unvote

##Vote: zwerdjib
calls my reasoned post a 'wagon hop' and says its a 'hard scumlean' without any actual content to explain. Bad and bad.

[zwerdjib]

says the guy who hopped to vote me based off a misquote

pardon?

you cant see your own post as a slip? thats weird

and youre not clear based off the fact that it was a misquote regardless.

[NekoNekoRex]

BTW I don't actually know if its going to be worth the effort or sanity to reread all 300 posts. Considering just starting from here and watching where it goes since I can actually play from a solid footing

pardon?

you cant see your own post as a slip? thats weird

and youre not clear based off the fact that it was a misquote regardless.

are you still calling that misquote a scumslip? wtf

[zwerdjib]

yeah actually

##Unvote

##Vote: zwerdjib
calls my reasoned post a 'wagon hop' and says its a 'hard scumlean' without any actual content to explain. Bad and bad.

> reasoned post

please reread what your original accusatory post was. reread it again. then tell me what part of it makes sense.

you even acknowledged enough that it didnt make sense that you pulled quotes. which was good

and now youre pretending it made sense from the start. i dont get it. what is your logic here

[zwerdjib]

BTW I don't actually know if its going to be worth the effort or sanity to reread all 300 posts. Considering just starting from here and watching where it goes since I can actually play from a solid footing
are you still calling that misquote a scumslip? wtf

no what lmao

[O4rfish]

Well, I guess that checks out.

##Unvote

[NekoNekoRex]

> reasoned post

please reread what your original accusatory post was. reread it again. then tell me what part of it makes sense.

you even acknowledged enough that it didnt make sense that you pulled quotes. which was good

and now youre pretending it made sense from the start. i dont get it. what is your logic here

I stand by it. He's made posts multiple times being cryptic and not open about his reads, which is bad. Dodging questions about reads like from Oarfish asking (I think? Player not accurate for sure) telling them to 'go back and read me' is really lame and feels scummy.

 The meta part I'll admit is pretty muddled by me trying to catch up and isn't as solid. That was the only part I tried to justify in my post (admittedly poorly)

You just labeling me as 'scum lean' and not actually saying anything about it except in retrospect is not good and you're being confusing by both saying my post is good and it isn't.
It does make sense, I just don't want to go pull quotes again from the 300 post hell that is pages 1-7 40 posts per page

and no, it isn't a "wagon hop", it was based off my own opinion? As I said, you wordlessly hopping to vote me is, in fact, a wagon hop right after oarfish.

[Dormio Ergo Sum]

define Statement6
{
        I feel like I disagree with (Nuxl) on a fundamental level with regards to how this game should be played.
}
define Statement7
{
        I think that discussion about metagaming and the like is not useful or productive and should be held for postgame.
}
define Statement8
{
        I think that (NekoNekoRex) is not worth voting or lynching, if I were to add my opinion on the latest series of events.
}
define Statement9
{
        The latest exchange, however, has made me realize that I don't like (O4rfish)'s posts. All (O4rfish) has done so far is make a weak case against (Nuxl) that seemed more like a show of annoyance than anything else and emphasize that we do need to make sure that we lynch somebody at the end of the day, only to drop everything to vote for (NekoNekoRex) for a supposed slip then backing off immediately when an explanation was provided.
}
query (Nuxl)
{
        ask (Statement6)
}
query (Playerbase)
{
        ask (Statement7)
        ask (Statement8)
        ask (Statement9)
        return (Opinions)
}

[Xinnidy]

I'm going to be real I haven't played mafia in like 6(? memory is hard) years so the prospect that people are actually trying is making me regret this something fierce, but I believe I've already made that implicit in my first post. I entered this game with the impression that it'd be ridiculously slow.

On the other hand, I have like 3 free hours right now, let's see if I remember how to play this eSport again.

##unvote
##Vote: Dormio

Hello there.
What is your stance on nuxl, since I take it you have him and zwerd in the same 'unimpressive' negative connotation boat. Do you agree with what Sir Touhou said about them? Or what sb's said in deference to Sir Touhou's read (and how sb doesn't scumread nuxl off of that). Why are you sitting on your zwerd vote, adding little other than you're still not impressed by then, and then bemoan about the arguing of metagaming (which, while at one point I would agree with you, page 10 is well after that point)?

Basically I'm saying there's a lot of content going around, specifically involving discussion of zwerd and nuxl by other players and you're handwaving it entirely as metagame talk. I think that's lazy at best?

While we're at it.
Hey @Serela why do you think raikaria is worth putting pressure votes on rn. Why do you think they're more worth pursuing for low content than niektory which you've admitted could be newb scum by your standards? And why did it take you getting prodded by nuxl to actually be bothered to vote raikaria? What?

By the way, why was that convincing enough for you to change your vote, @zwerd? Do you think what raik had done (or failed to do) awards pressure?

---

Warning - while you were typing 18 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.

well, beans.

i got the name wrong because i hadn't gotten up to rereading 274 posts yet actually.

im not sure how much reading i can take in such a short time, I'm getting mental fatigue just trying to read all this strawberries.

voting is something i should be doing though and there is conveniently a votecount after my post so

##Vote: Nuxl I don't like them. Meta reads are bad. Not being open about reads is scummy. Dodging questions is scummy. I've seen a lot of all of that from them so far.

Sup! Do you have... opinions on anyone else.


--

Warning - while you were typing 7 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.

Apparently you do.
fire truck me I write slow.
NNR you opened your reasons for voting nuxl with... 'I don't like them. meta bad.", which some would argue is neutral. And you're now saying the meta part was muddled and shifted your reasoning for voting him from how dodgy/cryptic he was. (which you explained after your vote, mind)
You also reasoned nuxlvote was not a confident vote in #317 but it's better than not voting... and now your vote stands on somebody that called that a wagon hop.
Do you think zwerd and nuxl are in cahoots and trying to pull one over us, washed up ex-mafia players? (please don't answer that)

I don't know what to this of this rn, tbh.
---

Warning - while you were --

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Hi Dormio! Sup? Do you still think of zwerd as scummy? Would you agree with NNR's reasons?


This post ended up as a stream of consciousness wall of text and I hate how it looks but I'm hitting post anyways.

[Dormio Ergo Sum]

define Statement10
{
        My current opinion of (Nuxl) is that, whilst I disagree with how he's playing, I feel that (Nuxl) is at least making a genuine effort to play the game in accordance with his logic.
}
define Statement11
{
        Also, lazy is my middle name.
}
define Statement12
{
        If I didn't still think of (zwerdjib) as being scummy, I would have moved my vote over to (O4rfish).
}
define Statement13
{
        I'm in a privileged position where I don't actually have to read any of (NekoNekoRex)'s posts and I fully intend to make use of this privilege.
}
if (Reply #328)
{
        cout <<(Statement10)
        cout <<(Statement11)
        cout <<(Statement12)
        cout <<(Statement13)
}
My current opinion of (Nuxl) is that, whilst I disagree with how he's playing, I feel that (Nuxl) is at least making a genuine effort to play the game in accordance with his logic. Also, lazy is my middle name. If I didn't still think of (zwerdjib) as being scummy, I would have moved my vote over to (O4rfish). I'm in a privileged position where I don't actually have to read any of (NekoNekoRex)'s posts and I fully intend to make use of this privilege.