zeep ive been reading your response to nnr and i still cant parse your response, although it could be because im tired. could you summarize it in a readable format because im not getting what you're saying atm.
right. i almost forgot to do this. very close to queueing for a league match.
let me break down his post
##Vote: Nuxl I don't like them. Meta reads are bad. Not being open about reads is scummy. Dodging questions is scummy. I've seen a lot of all of that from them so far.
this is the op i am criticizing. the reasons pinged me and i did not like how they felt.
first
> meta reads are bad
okay. we discussed this earlier and, conclusively, im pretty sure we agreed meta reads are bad when relied on. nnr even admitted this is a weak point
> not being open about reads is scummy
firstly, this is literally something you could vote
me for. or most multiposters in thread, for that manner, excluding maybe dormio shadoweh prims.
secondly, this isnt necessarily something i even see from nuxl. its obvious he does have reads, and its not like hes hiding them maliciously. in fact he even said
for future reference i'm usually conservative on posting my reads publicly. the mentality of how you are perceived versus what you might say could impact thread flow and scum reaction is a dilemma i face every day
which is a totally justified reason to not share reads as an open book. granted, its not like hes even dropping a few reads every once in a while, but i dont think this is a valid reason to lynch him fmpov
> dodging questions is scummy
what questions? you go on to say these are o4rs questions, but as far as i can tell he hasnt asked any? the most i got was the "what is your threat" thing, which was responded to anyway
----------
overall:
i dislike the op because its hyperbolic
doesnt even provide a quote or two to leverage this
and i dont even think the follow up justifies what was said here